Peer Review 3 is Tori’s last review (https://palettereviews.com/assignments/peer-review-3-chewing-balls-edwingyi/). Once again, we will review his thoughts, what went well, and what needs improvement. So, let’s get right into it.

Things going well:

• Name, Appearance, and Layout remind viewers of Boba
  • Chewing Balls allows the audience to refer to the action when consuming Boba
  • Header colour gradient reminiscent of Brown Sugar Boba Tea
  • Layout simplicity, with a focus on images and pictures, helps with the strategy employed by food and beverages 
• Reviews are consistent and have the same effort
  • The design choice is carefully inserted to promote desirability to a specific group.
  • Readers can quickly figure out where to find information. 

Suggestions:

• Tier List Ranking 
  • Keep the tier list updated to improve engagement
• A link of which location in a post
  • Locations can be inconsistent; don’t all taste the same
• Process Posts and Post
  • Try catching up 

I appreciate Tori’s honest feedback. The semester has been a crazy one, and just the motivation to do work is so hard (as many may know). I’ve been trying my best; hopefully, they will be okay. The Tier List has been updated, and I can add more places later. 

One thing I wanted to note is the location. Although I understand that places might not always be consistent, things happen with drinks as well, and they might not always taste the same. Although chains should generally have the same standard or practice, I think having specific locations down might deter audiences from going to those particular locations instead of trying a wide variety of them. Those are my thoughts, but I may implement that part if I have time.